Worklife

Ramblings about workplace culture, life in Japan, and then some.

Innovation and age

Sep 05, 2003 23:27 pm / 2 comments

S. Chan­drasekhar men­tions in Truth And Beauty: Aes­thet­ics and Moti­va­tions in Sci­ence “that a man of sci­ence past sixty does more harm than good.” I believe it is the same way with busi­ness lead­er­ship. Not only that. I believe any sort of key depart­ment leader should be no older than late thir­ties. I look around, and 99.9 per­cent of depart­ment man­agers in Japan’s major com­pa­nies are well over 40. Which means they are good at avoid­ing failures.

Okay, quick quiz. How old were cur­rent major IT com­pa­nies’ CEOs and their offi­cers when they made tremen­dous dif­fer­ence, and grew at steep rate? Apple? Microsoft? Dell? How about Japan­ese man­u­fac­tur­ing com­pa­nies. How old were Kono­suke Mat­sushita when he started his busi­ness? Ibuka and Morita? Honda? Now, how old do you think the exec­u­tives for these com­pa­nies are?

Inno­va­tion comes eas­ily to younger gen­er­a­tion. We need to learn to sup­port them, not hin­der them.

 

Possibly Related


 

2 Comments

You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site.

 
1. ?????????????????????? said on Sep 11, 2003 12:29 pm:

Your obser­va­tions are inter­est­ing, but I think we should be care­ful when mak­ing absolute pro­nounce­ments about human activ­i­ties. We in indus­tri­al­ized rich coun­tries like to say that the world is in an age of unprece­dented inno­va­tions. Is this true? I won­der. We know more about outer space than we do about the inside of the human body. Does age really mat­ter when it comes to inno­va­tion? Is it not the social con­di­tions and beliefs that lead us to think so? Older peo­ple can­not think as actively as young peo­ple. That is what we are told by the media, by soci­ety. In the so-called “prim­i­tive” soci­eties inno­va­tion never stops because con­di­tions demand it from everyone.

After I retired at 61, I was asked to teach uni­ver­sity courses at a Japan­ese uni­ver­sity in Japan­ese. I began reluc­tantly because it meant strug­gling to improve my Japan­ese at my age, but now enjoy it because I can meet and help to nuture young minds; not only the stu­dents, but young edu­ca­tors as well. More recently, I was asked to replace the younger head of my depart­ment as head because I am bet­ter adpated to receiv­ing and using new ideas.

Does age really mat­ter in inno­va­tion? What Japan needs is fresh ways of look­ing at all prob­lems. Life is com­plex. Soci­ety is com­plex. Why make it even more com­plex with estab­lished misconceptions.


 
2. Fujiko Suda said on Sep 12, 2003 00:41 am:

Many thanks for your com­ment, ????????????-san! I re-read my entry, and found that it does indeed sound really strong, and I see it can eas­ily lead to mis­con­cep­tions. I appre­ci­ate com­ments like yours, since it makes me more aware of the fact that what I say on the blog some­time is misleading.

As I quote S. Chadrasekhar, he also says in Truth and Beauty that there are excep­tions to such gen­er­al­iza­tion too. Kono­suke Mat­sushita was known for inno­v­a­tive ideas as he grew older. Peter Drucker keeps on going with his inno­v­a­tive ideas. The point I wanted to make is not that older peo­ple can­not think actively. Per­haps you might have worked with major Japan­ese com­pa­nies in Japan who had young depart­ment man­agers, but in the few com­pa­nies I worked with, it is such rar­ity that a depart­ment man­ager is younger than 40.

In gen­eral, younger peo­ple do rash things. They are not often not afraid of doing these kind of things. Break­through inno­va­tion often comes from not avoid­ing fail­ures. I am mak­ing a gen­er­al­iza­tion that older peo­ple in Japan who are in depart­ment manager’s posi­tion at major com­pa­nies are good at avoid­ing fail­ures. Thus, avoid­ing fail­ures often mean putting a lid on wild ideas, pos­si­ble seed for inno­va­tion, by people.


 

Leave a comment



More

« | »



Page 1 of 11